Behavior Gap Newsletter Behavior Gap Sketches

Cover to Cover: Dow at 36,000

by Carl on March 30, 2009

atlantic_36000dow“Stocks are now, we believe, in the midst of a one-time-only rise to much higher ground — to the neighborhood of 36,000 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. After they complete this historic ascent, owning them will still be profitable but the returns will decline. You won’t be able to make as much money from them each year. We believe that in the meantime, however, astounding profits will be made.”

“Many small investors are already catching on. They have ignored the dire warnings from professionals that have accompanied nearly every step of the Dow’s rise from 777 on August 12, 1982. They are rejecting the outdated model that Wall Street has used to assess whether stocks are overvalued — a model based largely on historical price-to-earnings, or P/E, ratios. That rejection reflects not their nuttiness but their sanity. Contrary to the famous warning from Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board — made on December 5, 1996, with the Dow at 6,437 — many investors are rationally exuberant. They have bid up the prices of stocks because stocks are a great deal.”—The Atlantic, September 1999

Yes, including stocks in your portfolio makes sense. However, 10 years after the original prediction, the highest the Dow has gone is 14,000+. Remember: there are good times to buy and good times to sell. You need to make those decisions based on your plan and not on the theories promoted by people who believe they’ve found a way to predict what the market will do next.

  • Paul Meloan
    By my crude math, going from 777 in 1982 to 6,500 in 1996 represents an annual jump of about 15%. Using the same growth rate, with the Dow at 7500 as I type this 15% annual increase in the Dow now for the next 15 years would take the Dow to over 60,000!

    Dow 36k seems just as unfathomable to individual investors today as Dow 10k must have looked in the summer of 1982. I agree with your central assertion, that predictions of future values is a fool's errand. Only now perhaps sentiment is as wildly unrealistic as it was for Glassman & Co a decade ago, just in the opposite direction.

    This is not to say we should all be giddy about sinking everything we own into the market. Hardly. It's just to
    show that our preoccupation with trying to know the un-knowable is an incredibly unproductive exercise.

    Paul Meloan
  • Great comment. So true. Oh. good blog too Carl.
  • Paul- thanks for your comments. It is the folly of this "preoccupation" with trying to know the future that we highlight in these "Cover-To-Cover" posts. My real point is that it does no good to focus on "investments" and "investing" without making sure that our decisions are made within the context of the "investors" plan.
  • Great Article! Thanks Carl. Really great perspective.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: