The Big Banks are Born>“In the long run, however, it’s about reinventing banks…At the same time, the race to the trillion-dollar bank is part of a bigger phenomenon. The emerging megabanks will be a geographically diverse conglomeration of traditional banking, mixed with an array of other financial services from stock brokerage to insurance to mutual funds…While creating a $1 trillion bank is now plausible–and plotting its strategy on paper is possible–making such a megabank succeed will be an amazing management feat. That’s a tall order in the banking business. The sheer scope of such a large and unproven institution is daunting…But these bankers believe that running a $1 trillion bank will not be any more complex than piloting General Electric or General Motors, Exxon, or Coca-Cola…Indeed, some in the industry see the current race for size as a dangerous excess, driven simply by egos and inflated share prices. Richard M. Kovacevich, chairman of $88 billion Norwest Corp. in Minneapolis, has undertaken dozens of small acquisitions–but he’s skeptical about bank megadeals. ‘The fact that they’re big and national doesn’t give them any more of a competitive edge,’ he says. ‘You get big because you’re better. You don’t get better because you’re big’…The dealmakers, of course, beg to differ. ‘Bigger is indeed better,’ a beaming McColl boasted at the press conference announcing the BankAmerica deal. ‘We’re not in any business we don’t understand. We think we’ll add to our product mix.”’—BusinessWeek, April 27, 1998
Cover to Cover: Trillion Dollar Banks
-
Mickey Abeshaus
Previous post: Behavior Gap Round Up, 3.6.09
Next post: Market Timing
