In a recent Wall Street Journal article Jason Zweig talks about the difficulty (and danger) of forecasting the stock market. I would recommend the article highly, but want to share a few thoughts.
Average Is Not Normal
We have been talking about this a lot lately. Because the market’s return has been right around 10%, we tend to define “normal” as any year that we get a return around 10%. We start to expect mentally, and we may even plan on (please make sure your financial planner is not doing this), getting 10% EACH year from money we invest in stock mutual funds. PLEASE understand that a 10% average return IS NOT THE SAME THING as a 10% return every year.
When we understand that most years the market return is nowhere near 10% we can begin to redefine “normal.”
If we can redefine normal, then we start to adjust our expectations.
When we adjust our expectations we might be less surprised when we are up or down a bunch (no surprise because “hey, it’s normal”).
If we are not surprised, then maybe we will not make some of the big behavioral mistakes like selling low, or refinancing the house to buy more when it’s high.
Average is Not Normal, my recent presentation I posted on SlideShare, explains this concept in more detail.
Market Timing and Forecasting is a COMPLETE Waste of TIME
Market returns come in very short and very violent bursts, both up and down. The rest of the time it is relatively boring. Zweig points to a new study that reaffirms something that good financial planners have been talking about for years. If you take the market return from 1900 to 2008, the average has been around 10%. Now get this:
- If you missed the 10 best days, you lost over 60% of the gain for the entire period. Ten days out of 29,694!
- If you managed to forecast the 10 worst days you could have TRIPLED your return!
Unbelievable.
As Zweig points out, “The moments that made all the difference were just 0.03% of history: 10 days out of 29,694.”
CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHEN ONE OF THOSE DAYS IS COMING?
The lesson is really this: if you want to earn the average return, you have to be in the market for the best days. If you want to be in the market for the best days, you are just going to have to live through the worst days as well. They come together.
(I love Jason Zweig, but it is really unfortunate that after laying out the case for not forecasting he felt the need to tell us one way to do it. Ignore that part of the article.)
{ 5 comments }
Carl,
Great post. Once again, you’ve done a great job of cutting to the core of this issue. I posted something on this same article recently, too. Can’t believe Zweig denounces forecasts and then is all too willing to share his own forecast. Oh well, like you said, the other 95% of the article is well worth the read.
Great article. Sometimes you need someone to point out the obvious to you to get an “A-ha!” moment.
As I was reading your slideshow, I thought that a good comparison would be to consider what would you pack for vacation if the only climate information you had was that the “Average Annual Temperature” of your destination was 60 degrees.
@Sylvia- The average temperature comparison is great!
Sage advice…stay the course and don’t miss those big days…they make a BIG difference.
Hi Carl, people are always pointing out, that if you miss the 10 best days, two-thirds of the cumulative gains produced by the Dow over the past 109 years would disappear.
But its the next sentence that is important!
Conversely, had you sidestepped the market’s 10 worst days, you would have tripled the actual return of the Dow. Now the question in my mind is what is the best way to do that. Note you don’t have to be 100% accurate, If you miss half of the bad days you should make about 150% of the dow’s return. Something to shoot for.
Comments on this entry are closed.