<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forecasting is a Waste of Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/</link>
	<description>Exploring the relationship between people and their money.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:53:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behaviorgap.com/?p=701#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Hi Carl, people are always pointing out, that if you miss the 10 best days, two-thirds of the cumulative gains produced by the Dow over the past 109 years would disappear.

But its the next sentence that is important!
Conversely, had you sidestepped the market&#039;s 10 worst days, you would have tripled the actual return of the Dow. Now the question in my mind is what is the best way to do that. Note you don&#039;t have to be 100% accurate, If you miss half of the bad days you should make about 150% of the dow&#039;s return. Something to shoot for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carl, people are always pointing out, that if you miss the 10 best days, two-thirds of the cumulative gains produced by the Dow over the past 109 years would disappear.</p>
<p>But its the next sentence that is important!<br />
Conversely, had you sidestepped the market&#8217;s 10 worst days, you would have tripled the actual return of the Dow. Now the question in my mind is what is the best way to do that. Note you don&#8217;t have to be 100% accurate, If you miss half of the bad days you should make about 150% of the dow&#8217;s return. Something to shoot for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behaviorgap.com/?p=701#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Sage advice...stay the course and don&#039;t miss those big days...they make a BIG difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sage advice&#8230;stay the course and don&#8217;t miss those big days&#8230;they make a BIG difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behaviorgap.com/?p=701#comment-35</guid>
		<description>@Sylvia- The average temperature comparison is great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sylvia- The average temperature comparison is great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behaviorgap.com/?p=701#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Great article. Sometimes you need someone to point out the obvious to you to get an &quot;A-ha!&quot; moment.

As I was reading your slideshow, I thought that a good comparison would be to consider what would you pack for vacation if the only climate information you had was that the &quot;Average Annual Temperature&quot; of your destination was 60 degrees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. Sometimes you need someone to point out the obvious to you to get an &#8220;A-ha!&#8221; moment.</p>
<p>As I was reading your slideshow, I thought that a good comparison would be to consider what would you pack for vacation if the only climate information you had was that the &#8220;Average Annual Temperature&#8221; of your destination was 60 degrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.behaviorgap.com/forecasting-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.behaviorgap.com/?p=701#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Carl,
Great post. Once again, you&#039;ve done a great job of cutting to the core of this issue. I posted something on this same article recently, too.  Can&#039;t believe Zweig denounces forecasts and then is all too willing to share his own forecast.  Oh well, like you said, the other 95% of the article is well worth the read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl,<br />
Great post. Once again, you&#8217;ve done a great job of cutting to the core of this issue. I posted something on this same article recently, too.  Can&#8217;t believe Zweig denounces forecasts and then is all too willing to share his own forecast.  Oh well, like you said, the other 95% of the article is well worth the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
